Let me start with my overall take on this film, so when I get all sorts of picky in 30 seconds, you'll remember that I actually enjoyed this film. I walked away feeling pretty satisfied with the movie, and not just because I got to sit in a Laz-i-Boy and order my meal from my theater seat. This is a pretty solidly entertaining film, full of pretty fantastic acting.
BUT. This is where I get picky folks, so if you don't want to hear it, go back and re-read that last paragraph.
I expect a lot out of movies, especially ones that are trying to be so tightly designed as this one. So when a film has everything going for it and some little flaw flaunts itself, it drives me batty and I have to say something. Because really, where is the joy in life if it is not in criticizing other people's hard work?
So, here are the pecadillos, in no particular order:
- Ellen Page, my friends. I shouldn't have to say anything else, but I'm going to. You and I may have loved her in Juno, because she was basically put on this earth to play that role (where deadpan delivery was a requirement), but her generally emotionless face and wooden acting need more work. When she is standing in the same room as Leonardo DiCaprio (who, I have to say, I am not the world's biggest fan of, but even I can admit that the man can act his ass off), I expect her to rise to the challenge. If she's playing a character that has to scold his, she better freakin' make me believe it. She was almost there. Like that famous Shel Silverstein poem, "Almost perfect, but not quite."
- The laws of physics. Okay, this film is all about the idea of people entering each other's dreams to plant or steal ideas, so there's a bit of suspension of disbelief going on to start. But there is one scene in particular that bothers me: the one with Joseph Gordon-Levitt fighting some unknown actor in the 2nd dream level down after they have lost gravity because in the first dream level, Gordon-Levitt's sleeping body is suspended in that zero-gravity state because he is in a van that is toppling backwards off a bridge into a river below. The fighting men are supposed to be tossed about in the same way that Gordon-Levitt's body is being tossed about in the van as it hurtles towards the water. However, the movements don't match up. I know this is a really picky thing, but it's quite noticeable after you've spent over an hour in the theatre watching a film that is impeccably aligned despite what could be a very difficult plot to follow.
- Offhand commentary is NOT funny. This is just a minor annoyance, but I think it's a sign of some poor screenwriting choices. There are a few moments when the director allowed the actors to drop themselves into a buddy action movie, where flip comments that go for easy laughs are a dime a dozen. Unfortunately for this film, the comments are completely out of character when they're done. I'm not saying that they don't get the laughs (JM was sitting next to me and laughing heartily each time one of these comments was uttered), but I found them to be a bit jarring and out-of-place.
- BAD ENDING. Okay, this is the big one for me. So, one of the key ideas in this film is that all these dreamwalkers, for lack of a better term, have one way to remind their brains that they are in a dream or in the real world. Each dreamwalker carries his or her own token, for which only s/he knows the real dimensions and weight of. If something is off with the token, then the dreamwalker is still in the dream world. For DiCaprio's character, that token is a top, which used to belong to his late wife. If he is in the dream world, the top spins forever as the rules of gravity don't necessarily apply. However, if the top falls over after spinning for a while, he knows he has re-entered the real world. The movie ends with DiCaprio spinning the top and walking away before he finds out if he is the real world or the dream world, with the camera staying focused on the spinning top, fading to the credits just at the moment that it seems we, the audience, would find out which world he was in. THIS REALLY PISSES ME OFF. This is such an art-school ending that I cannot even begin to describe my displeasure at this type of ending. There is nothing that indicates the sheer arrogance of a movie as much as this type of ending. They want you, the audience, to decide what ending you think should have happened. People will come out of this movie swearing that DiCaprio made everything right in the end and got to return to his real life in the real world because of it. Others will come out of it swearing the exact opposite - that he lost his connection to the real world and instead chose to remain in his mind, where he could invent whatever story made him the most happy. A movie of true quality will not let you leave the theatre wondering what happened. Or so I say at least. I watch movies to see stories that have closure, very much unlike real life. I do not want to leave the theatre feeling confused, wondering, "Whatever happened to that nice boy, Leo DiCaprio?"



